One of my projects for the early winter is compiling a number
of Anita Ray stories, both old and new, into a single collection. The published
stories in this group first appeared in Level Best Books anthologies, beginning
in 2003, with the publication of “The Silver House.” The stories are
consistently around five to six thousand words. That was no surprise. To
balance these and vary the reading experience, I’ve written six new ones three
of which are fewer than two thousand words.
After I arranged the stories and began reading, I expected
to encounter certain editing problems, such as two characters in different
stories with the same name, or changes in the details of a certain store or
hotel. I expected some inconsistencies in spelling, minor copy-editing issues
easily corrected. But I found a few other surprises.
First, my writing has changed over the years, becoming
tighter in description and sharper in dialogue. I expected some change in my
style, perhaps new quirks and idiosyncrasies to be removed, but I didn’t expect
this. The discovery raises the question of what is necessary in terms of consistency
and creating a whole. Do I go back to the older stories and revise them to
match more closely the more recent ones, or do I leave them all as they are?
Second, the more recent stories are more traditional in
terms of the crime and criminal, and offer less in the way of the anthropology
of the region in India that I find so interesting. I can’t and don’t want to
change the stories in terms of theme and cultural features, but I am taking
note of the change and trying to find balance in the arrangement.
Third, I have remained consistently inconsistent and
indecisive when it comes to the transcription of certain Malayalam words into
English. I can’t seem to decide between Pongala and Pongaala, the name of an annual
ritual that is known as the largest gathering of women in the world, verified
by Guinness Book of Records. They’re up to five million by now. Nor can I
settle on one transliteration of the breakfast food called idli or ittali. I
most often use idlies but also sometimes use iddalies or ittalies. The first
one reflects current pronunciation in the area where I lived.
Fourth, several recurring characters don’t have given names
in these stories; not until a later novel do I finally name them. Do I add
those names here, to make things easier for readers who know the characters
from later stories, or do I leave things as they are?
Fifth, the role of some characters has changed over the
years. For a brief period Ravi served in the dining room, but that soon came to
an end. Should I simply remove him from that task and replace him with the
established waiter, Moonu. (And I should definitely settle on one spelling for
his name.)
Sixth, Anita is addressed in different ways depending on the
speaker’s perceived relationship with her. Those who know her well but consider
her a superior and want to show respect address her as Chechi, Older Sister.
Those who have known her most of her life, perhaps as a family servant, and
still consider her the child of the family, might call her Anita Missi. I’m
relieved to find that I’m consistent in the use of madam and memsahib.
All in all, compiling this collection has been rewarding as
well as a reminder that writing is an ongoing job, and what has been written
can always be improved.
If you’re interested in reading one of the Anita Ray
stories, go to
http://www.amazon.com/Secret-Pulluvan-Drum-Anita-Mystery-ebook/dp/B00SHWPSPA
or to http://www.amazon.com/Silver-House-Anita-Mystery-Story-ebook/dp/B0165WGQP4








