When I was a judge for an annual writing contest, the scoring criteria was based on the Diederich Scale. Six categories were described and points/ scores were to be given( high middle and low), based on your interpretation of the writing within the category descriptions. Not all criteria applied with some entries you were given, but you as a judge would determine which most applied to the entry you were judging, and score points accordingly. It was not an easy task, but after "judge training" and a few contests under my belt, I found the system had a hidden bonus. It sharpened your insight about your own writing. Because it was a boon to me, and I assume many writing contests may use a similar system, I thought it might be helpful to new writers to view the categories and use them as a guideline for their own writing.
CHARACTERIZATION
PLOT and CONFLICT
DIALOGUE
STYLE and PACING
MECHANICS
PRESENTATION
The first three category descriptions, Characterization, Plot, Conflict, and Dialogue are fairly general expectations to follow and score, but deciding which range, (high,middle and Low) most applies to an entry was difficult at times. If you as a writer did your homework about rules of manuscript given by most publishers, the last two categories, Mechanics and Presentation should not result in a problematic scoring in that category.
Of all the categories, I seemed to have the most difficulty with number 4. Style and Pacing, so I summarize below the guidelines for giving the high point rank for that category. Hopefully, it may help new writers view what contests or publishers are looking for.
High award of points:
Writer's Voice rings true without being overwhelming, The story moves at an appropriate pace to the story situation, Compulsion to turn the page stays with the reader; Author puts words together in an interesting or unusual way, sentence length varies as necessary to tone and mood, Opening and ending hooks work well; may need polish, but the concepts are effective
This type of guideline for judging writing contests may have changed over the years, but I feel that the categories may always provide a tool to give one a good measure of their writing, regardless of genre. O f course, a good editor will help, but if you consider a future writing contest, do check out your entry with the above categories. and best of luck to everyone.
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
Friday, February 21, 2014
Interview with Author Pamela Thibodeaux by Jacqueline Seewald
Award-winning author, Pamela S. Thibodeaux is the Co-Founder
and a Lifetime Member of Bayou
Writers Group. Multi-published in romantic fiction as well as creative
non-fiction, her writing has been tagged as, “Inspirational with an Edge!”™
and reviewed as “steamier and grittier
than the typical Christian novel without
decreasing the message.” Pam first
interviewed with us when her Five Star/Gale novel THE VISIONARY was published
in November 2011. We invited Pam to return and update us.
Question: Could you tell us a little bit about the
heroine and hero of your Five Star novel?
Answer:
Actually Jacqueline, there are two h/h
in this novel. Twins Trevor & Taylor Forrestier (pronounced Foresjay) are
the main characters along with their sweethearts Pam LeBlanc and Alex Broussard.
Question: What is the
genre of your novel? Why did you select
it?
Answer:
The Visionary was my debut
inspirational women’s fiction novel and the inspirational genre chose me when I
recommitted my life and committed my writing to Christ. Before that fateful day
in 1989, I wrote straight-out romance.
Question: What
inspired this novel? How did it come about?
Answer:
When I initially wrote this story, I thought it would be a light, sweet
romance. But one day, a friend read the first few chapters and remarked that I
should be careful of the ‘closeness’ of the twins. Well, twins are normally
close, but further discussion with her and other beta reader, revealed a
closeness not considered ‘normal’ but extreme. Well as a writer, that put me on
a quest to find out what had happened to or between the twins to make them
cling so tightly to one another and not let other people into their world. What
came out of those questions both humbled and scared the daylights out of me as
I’d heard about such abuse toward children but never experienced such
treatment, much less explored the true depth and meaning of the healing
available through the awesome power of God’s love to the most wounded of souls.
Question: Can you tell us about some of your other
newer published novels?
Answer:
Currently I have five other novels
(4-part Tempered series & The Inheritance) along with six short stories,
and a how-to book for authors, published and available for readers to enjoy.
Blurbs and reviews of all can be found at my website: http://pamelathibodeaux.com
My latest release, Love is a Rose, is a devotional
which parallels the love of God and the Christian life to the words of the
song, The Rose, written by Amanda McBroom and sung by Conway
Twitty & Bette Midler. Love is a Rose is available for Kindle and in print
@ Amazon, and electronically at B&N, Deeper Shopping & Smashwords
Question: What made you start writing?
Answer:
I’ve always been an avid reader but didn’t consider writing until, in my early
twenties and pregnant I read one-too-many insipid, boring and disappointing
romances. Thinking I could do better turned out to be not only the catalyst to
my writing career, but a mite arrogant as writing and writing well
are at two totally different ends of the spectrum.
Question: What advice would you offer to those who are
currently writing novels?
Answer:
Don’t give up and don’t quit. Writing is a gift – a talent given to you from
God. Don’t hide your gift or bury your talent. If the novel isn’t moving, try
writing something different – a short story, article, poem or essay. Take a
break if you have to or even a hiatus but don’t quit.
Question: Where and when will readers be able to obtain
your novel?
Answer:
The Visionary is available
through Deeper Shopping, Amazon
& Barnes
& Noble in hardcover. The Ebook is available for Kindle,
Nook
and other E-readers @ Smashwords.
Website address: http://www.pamelathibodeaux.com
Pam, thanks for being our guest
today at Author Expressions. Wishing you continued success in the future.
Pam is available for both questions
and comments, so join us!
Monday, February 17, 2014
Book Clubs Rock!
My first REAL introduction to "book clubs" was as an author. I have had the privilege of speaking to several book clubs, of answering questions, and finding out what readers thought of my book, Feisty Family Values. I'm not a big joiner, but I must say those folks seemed to have a great deal of fun. And each time I've been tempted to ask if I can join their club.
Last year I joined a book club. We meet once a month and I've only really enjoyed reading a couple of books on their list so far. They seem to gravitate toward the dark stories. Deep. Sad. Traumatic. When someone suggested something fun for Halloween, a witch bounty hunter, I was ALL in. And it was great fun to read. But the other books, not so much. The gals are great. We have a lovely visit and talk about the stories and characters, family and spouses - which I do enjoy. But...
A week ago I visited one of our local independent book stores (Watermark Books) for their annual book club event. Not only did we get free books, we got delicious cookies and a discussion with a global pub house editor. Great stuff. Watermark has a Chick Lit book club that was reading The Language of Flowers, which just happened to be on my "to be read" list (actually on my bookshelf waiting, in fact). I read it and LOVED it, but the night of their meeting landed the day after a huge snow storm and I decided to stay out of the muck. So disappointing.
I was at Watermark this past Saturday to cheer on Lois Ruby, a YA author buddy of mine, who has a new book out Rebel Spirits. Having arrived an hour early I grabbed a delicious lunch and chatted with Ann, who is the Chick Lit book club leader. We both loved The Language of Flowers. She asked me if I thought the main characters (who are terribly flawed, but endearing) would stay together. "We always like to speculate on that," she said. Laughing, my response was yes, they spoke the same language - the language of flowers.
What I love about book clubs is the shared experience of the book we all read. When we share our reactions and thoughts, the story opens up, becoming even bigger and better. We each find something that resonates (or not) with us and our experience, and it's nice to be able to share that with others who may have felt the same way. Often we disagree, but it's wonderful to hear the "why."As an author I am really into the "why." The emotions and stories that one small word generates can inspire is amazing.
Do you belong to a book club? What was your latest book club read? What books do you recommend?
I have such a backlog of lovely books on my shelves that Ann suggested I begin my own book club and read through it. What a great idea? Who wants to join?
Last year I joined a book club. We meet once a month and I've only really enjoyed reading a couple of books on their list so far. They seem to gravitate toward the dark stories. Deep. Sad. Traumatic. When someone suggested something fun for Halloween, a witch bounty hunter, I was ALL in. And it was great fun to read. But the other books, not so much. The gals are great. We have a lovely visit and talk about the stories and characters, family and spouses - which I do enjoy. But...
A week ago I visited one of our local independent book stores (Watermark Books) for their annual book club event. Not only did we get free books, we got delicious cookies and a discussion with a global pub house editor. Great stuff. Watermark has a Chick Lit book club that was reading The Language of Flowers, which just happened to be on my "to be read" list (actually on my bookshelf waiting, in fact). I read it and LOVED it, but the night of their meeting landed the day after a huge snow storm and I decided to stay out of the muck. So disappointing.
I was at Watermark this past Saturday to cheer on Lois Ruby, a YA author buddy of mine, who has a new book out Rebel Spirits. Having arrived an hour early I grabbed a delicious lunch and chatted with Ann, who is the Chick Lit book club leader. We both loved The Language of Flowers. She asked me if I thought the main characters (who are terribly flawed, but endearing) would stay together. "We always like to speculate on that," she said. Laughing, my response was yes, they spoke the same language - the language of flowers.
What I love about book clubs is the shared experience of the book we all read. When we share our reactions and thoughts, the story opens up, becoming even bigger and better. We each find something that resonates (or not) with us and our experience, and it's nice to be able to share that with others who may have felt the same way. Often we disagree, but it's wonderful to hear the "why."As an author I am really into the "why." The emotions and stories that one small word generates can inspire is amazing.
Do you belong to a book club? What was your latest book club read? What books do you recommend?
I have such a backlog of lovely books on my shelves that Ann suggested I begin my own book club and read through it. What a great idea? Who wants to join?
Friday, February 14, 2014
Great Love Stories in History and Literature by Jacqueline Seewald
I confess. Valentine’s Day is my favorite holiday. I suppose
it’s because I’m a romantic at heart. Last year I blogged about how my older
son and his wife were married on Valentine’s Day. It was a joyful wedding, loving
and romantic. No big fancy affair, just the bride and groom, my husband and
myself, the bride’s best friend, and a judge happy to officiate, followed by a
wedding breakfast at a local hotel. Afterwards the bride and groom took a long drive so that my son could represent in court a couple accused of white
collar crime.
Love stories have always been an important part of history
and literature. Cleopatra and Mark Anthony. Cleopatra and Julius Caesar--Cleopatra
got around. As Shakespeare said, “she was a woman of infinite variety.” Then
there is the story of Napoleon and Josephine, another passionate love affair.
In the Bible, we also find some of the world’s greatest and unforgettable love
stories. What can be more romantic than the story of Ruth or Solomon and the
Queen of Sheba? And there is the story of Esther which is celebrated on Purim.
A lot of the world’s most famous, classical love stories, of course, did not end happily: Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet, Helen of Troy and Paris, Lancelot and Guinevere are tragedies.
Thomas Hardy wrote a number of tragic love stories as did the Bronte sisters. For something lighter, I prefer Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice.
Elizabeth and Darcy are memorable. I’ve read and reread that novel numerous
times.
Love quite literally makes the world go round. Give yourself
a Valentine’s gift today and choose to read a romance. Candy will make you fat.
Flowers wilt and die. But a great romance can be read and reread offering continuing enjoyment.
If you’re of a mind to
read some romantic historical fiction, I suggest a look at my contest-winning
novel THE CHEVALIER, available in all e-book formats from: http://steamereads.com.au/product/the-chevalier/
If you enjoy romantic short stories, consider my collection
BEYOND THE BO TREE:
All my romances have happy endings. I won’t consider writing
any other kind.
Can you think of any romances you would recommend to
readers? What sort of romances do you particularly enjoy reading?
Friday, February 7, 2014
Keeping up with changes
Language is changing, but this is nothing new for writers.
We know this, and for us the struggle is which side to stand on when the issue
is any one particular word. For instance, I have a few pet peeves when it comes
to writing, and I know I’m not alone, but am I right to want certain words used
in certain ways? Or am I merely recording my resistance to a change in
progress?
When writers get going on what bugs them, the list of pet
peeves ends up longer than the telephone book. (Remember those? No? They were
long.) Anyone who follows the discussion on word usage, either by lurking or
sharing, is sure to find one of his or her own quirks on the list.
I know one of my writing habits annoys other writers. I have
taken to using then as a conjunction. For example, “Anita directed the driver to pull up at the next stop sign, then gave him a
new set of directions.” In this sentence I omitted the conjunction and and let then serve as the conjunction. This is an error according to some
other writers. My Webster’s (2d College edition) does allow one usage of then with conjunctive force, but the
manner in which I use it may go farther than that allowed. But the use of then as a conjunction is clearly the
sign of a word in transition. Nevertheless, I was pondering correcting this
error in my own writing and enjoying The
Ballad of the Sad Café by Carson McCullers when I came across not one, not
two, but three sentences in which then
was used in the sense of the conjunction and.
What’s a writer to do?
Of course, I have a few pet peeves of my own. I cannot hear
the word humble without thinking of
Uriah Heep, who was anything but. Furthermore, when I hear or read it today, I
think the writer must mean modest, moderate
in one’s behavior or opinion of oneself, not boastful, rather than humble, not proud, aware of one’s
defects, and even a lack of self-respect.
Another word pairing that comes to mind regularly is enormous and enormity. The first, enormous,
suggests great size. The second, enormity,
suggests great wickedness or outrageousness. Only recently has the dictionary
come to recognize that enormity can
be loosely used for great size.
Back in the dark ages, in the late 1970s, I carefully read the
instructions for preparing a dissertation to be submitted to the graduate
school office, not my professors or a panel of academics, but the secretary of
the department. One requirement concerned the word none. The word none was
to be treated as singular throughout. “None was available” was required, not
preferred, usage. Students were warned that no exceptions would be made on the issue of this word. Apparently, the office grammarian could overrule the
dissertation committee on a technicality.
Less troublesome but still startling for me is the overuse
of the word hero when the word winner would be more appropriate. Indeed,
I see the word hero applied to
instances of simple good behavior when the person might simply be called decent.
Last, I offer up the fading use of disinterested to mean without bias or interest for personal gain; objective
and fair minded. It is not synonymous with indifferent,
which can mean neutral but generally means lack of interest. These two words are like ships passing in the night.
The words I have examined here are words in transition.
Their meanings are changing, and purists pounce on examples of the new usage as
though by correcting one writer we can stem the tide of change. We can’t. We
can no more make ain’t acceptable
usage for the first person contraction “I am not” than we can change other
points of grammar and word usage. Our lectures to our fellow writers are really
records of our response to the change happening around us. And sometimes (note the use of a
conjunction to begin a sentence, another no-no in the 1970s), we’ll be on the
wrong side of the change, and sometimes on the right side. And I personally
never know which side I’m on.
Labels:
Carson McCullers,
word usage,
writing
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)